The subject of this study is the investigation of the penetration of anglicisms into Croatian journalism and their usage in journalistic texts. The aim of the study is to analyse the reasons for using anglicisms, the role of proof-readers and editors in this process, journalists' attitudes towards anglicisms, and to assess the potential effectiveness of legal language regulation. The hypotheses include: (1) anglicisms are inevitably used in journalistic texts due to the rapid emergence of new terms, (2) the lack of proofreading support leads to variable standards in the use of anglicisms, (3) journalists have a pragmatic attitude towards anglicisms, recognizing their value in modern journalism, and (4) legal regulation of language is not effective in controlling the use of anglicisms. The methods used in the research include qualitative interviews with journalists, proof-readers, and editors from various media outlets. The analysis of the interviews provided insight into the practical challenges and attitudes of professionals towards anglicisms in journalistic practice. The results show that the penetration of anglicisms into journalistic texts is inevitable due to the rapid development of new terms in fields such as technology and medicine, as well as short deadlines for text production. Proof-readers and editors are no longer standard in newsrooms, leading to inconsistent standards in the use of anglicisms. Journalists recognize the practicality of anglicisms and their role in maintaining the relevance and appeal of texts but emphasize the importance of writing in a language understandable to all readers. Scepticism towards legal language regulation is based on understanding language as a dynamic entity that evolves through use and social interaction. The conclusions suggest that the penetration of anglicisms into Croatian journalism is a complex phenomenon driven by practical needs and global trends. Effective management of this process requires a balance between language protection and adaptation to modern communication trends, rather than rigid legal regulations.